Investors Keep Buying the DRAM ETF Despite the Selloff. They Might Be Right About Memory Stocks.
Investors Keep Buying the DRAM ETF Despite the Selloff. They Might Be Right About Memory Stocks..
Memory chip stocks have endured a sharp reversal in recent weeks as investors questioned whether the enormous sums being invested in artificial intelligence infrastructure can continue at the same pace. The selloff has swept through leading memory and data-storage companies, dragging the Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) sharply below its recent highs and testing confidence in one of the market's most crowded AI trades.
Still, investors have responded to the weakness by buying rather than heading for the exits. The Roundhill Memory ETF reportedly attracted approximately $10 billion in fresh capital during its recent drawdown, an extraordinary show of conviction. The move suggests that many investors viewed the selloff as an opportunity to gain exposure to the memory sector at lower prices.
Microsoft Earnings Preview: Get Ready for Soaring AI Spending to Sink MSFT Stock
Why Nvidia (NVDA) Stock Faces Sell-the-News Risk Following Its Q2 Earnings Report
So, the key question now is whether DRAM investors are correctly anticipating another leg higher—or simply buying into a trade whose best gains have already passed. Let's take a closer look.
The Roundhill Memory ETF is an actively managed thematic ETF that provides targeted exposure to global companies involved in producing memory and data-storage technologies, including DRAM, NAND flash, and high-bandwidth memory. The fund is designed to benefit from rising memory demand driven by artificial intelligence infrastructure, data centers, cloud computing, consumer electronics, and other data-intensive applications. Roundhill describes DRAM as the first U.S.-listed ETF focused specifically on memory semiconductor stocks.
DRAM's portfolio is highly concentrated in the three companies that dominate the global memory market. Micron Technology (MU) is the largest holding at 26.91%, followed by Samsung Electronics (SMSN.L.IX) at 25.88% and SK Hynix (SKHY) at 22.18%. Together, these three stocks account for approximately 76% of the ETF's portfolio. Meanwhile, DRAM holds Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron through swap positions. Other notable holdings include SanDisk (SNDK), Kioxia Holdings (KXIAY), Western Digital (WDC), Seagate Technology (STX), and GigaDevice Semiconductor.
Launched on April 2, the ETF trades on the Cboe BZX Exchange and has an annual expense ratio of 0.65%. It currently holds $25.05 billion in assets under management.
DRAM has soared more than 92% since launching at around $30 per share in early April. It reached an all-time high of $81.34 on June 22.
Memory chipmakers and other AI-related stocks came under heavy pressure in recent weeks amid growing investor concerns that the AI boom has become overextended. As the three holdings responsible for roughly 75% of the Roundhill Memory ETF's performance took a hit, DRAM also slumped. It has fallen about 29% from its all-time high, marking a move into a technical bear market. Still, this hasn't appeared to spook investors, who have continued buying the ETF with both hands.
According to ETFDb, DRAM attracted about $9.4 billion in net inflows during its retreat from its peak. Despite losing nearly 30% of its value, the fund held $25.05 billion in assets under management as of Wednesday, only slightly below its late-June peak of $25.9 billion. This means that inflows have almost entirely offset the fund's market losses.
Even more interestingly, the fund attracted more than $1.65 billion in net inflows last week. That's despite memory companies suffering their worst week in years. With that, such strong dip-buying signals robust investor conviction in the semiconductor memory sector.
And now comes the most logical question: Are dip buyers right to bet on another leg higher for memory chipmakers, or is the cycle over? Let's find out.
As I've said multiple times in my previous articles, it's critical to separate the facts from the noise, particularly when it comes to memory chipmakers and the memory cycle as a whole. By doing so, we can see that some things that initially appear to be major negatives are actually not as bad as feared—or may even be positives.
The recent selloff in memory chipmakers initially began as a healthy round of profit-taking following a near-parabolic rally. However, the selloff was later amplified by several factors, ranging from liquidations in South Korea and overcapacity concerns sparked by Meta Platforms' (META) plan to sell computing capacity to escalating tensions in the Middle East and fears of growing competition from China. It pushed many chipmakers into bear-market territory, leaving investors wondering whether another leg higher is possible or the party is over.
As I argued in one of my recent articles, much of this year's chip rally has been supported by improving fundamentals. With that, to determine whether chipmakers still have room to run, I think it's important to turn our attention to the broader fundamental picture. And you might be surprised, but it has actually become even stronger since the chip selloff began in late June. Ironically, some of the factors that contributed to the selloff—or were meant to sour investor mood—only strengthened my bull case.
First, there's the China factor, which weighed on chipmakers from two directions. Last Friday, Moonshot AI unveiled Kimi K3, which offers frontier-level intelligence at a fraction of the cost of proprietary Western models, prompting investors to draw parallels with last year's "DeepSeek moment." However, the model contains 2.8 trillion parameters, all of which must still be stored in memory, meaning the need for high-bandwidth memory hasn't gone anywhere. Separately, investors were worried that DRAM maker CXMT and NAND flash maker YMTC would aggressively expand capacity and pressure pricing, but Citi analysts said in a recent note that those fears are unlikely to materialize this year or next.
Since I've raised the pricing question, it is also worth addressing a recent warning from SK Hynix executive Chey Tae-won, who reportedly said last week that current memory prices are unsustainable over the longer term. In fact, this is nothing new, as we already know that major memory chipmakers have been expanding capacity to meet booming demand. When supply catches up with demand, prices tend to fall. However, the bulk of major new production capacity will not come online until late 2027 and 2028. This means memory chipmakers should retain unprecedented pricing power for the foreseeable future, enabling them to expand margins and deliver explosive profit growth. I explored this in greater detail in my latest article on Micron.