Internacional

America's Biggest Utility Sees Blackouts Ahead

America's Biggest Utility Sees Blackouts Ahead.

Por Redacción Sinergia Empresarial · 13 de julio de 2026 · 5 min
America's Biggest Utility Sees Blackouts Ahead

The above button links to Coinbase. Yahoo Finance is not a broker-dealer or investment adviser and does not offer securities or cryptocurrencies for sale or facilitate trading. Coinbase pays us for certain activity generated through this link. Prices displayed are informational.

The CEO of America's largest utility, EXELON, foresees blackouts in the US in 2027. To boost power supply Calvin Butler wants states to allow his utility to build new power plants. Opponents will object, saying this would saddle utility consumers with the risks. Whereas now, the builders take the risks.

Meanwhile, we are scratching our heads because economists have long theorized that utilities build excess rate base in order to raise earnings. We would amend this to argue that utility managers only deploy excess capital when they can earn more than their cost of capital (would you invest to earn 8% if you had to pay 10% for the borrowed money?), and we are absolutely convinced that utilities have been earning more than cost of capital for decades. In other words, they should be over- investing like crazy in facilities that would prevent things like electricity blackouts.

But they aren't. Back before COVID we presented a paper saying that the electric industry was underinvesting by close to 50%. Capital expenditures have risen substantially, but they still look too low. And if EXELON's CEO is right, we will know soon enough.

We examined industry investment for 2004-2024, the period following the corporate reorganizations resulting from the restructuring of the industry. ( Data was not yet available for 2025.) Sure enough, we found that utilities increased their rate base by about 5.5% per year, although sales rose only 0.5% per year. Meaning a lot of extra investment is not required by customers, a sure sign of padding the rate base? Not so, because after adjusting for the cost of inflation, we estimate that the utilities added only 1.2% per year to the rate base in real terms. That's not much padding. Probably not enough to replace the old plant, no less prepare for the expected demand and environmental challenges.

We've been trying to figure out why an industry that thrives on rate base expansion in a regulatory environment didn't spend more. Perhaps managements were too focused on short term financial results calculated in current dollars, or because most of them don't have engineering or construction expertise anymore, or because they fear the political pushback of approaching their regulators with the bad news (need to raise prices), or because they plan to let their successors handle the problems, or because they take their cues about the world around them from their comforting trade organization. We leave the answer to the psychoanalysts.

The warning from the boss of EXELON, Mr. Butler, however, hints at a different line of inquiry. In the transmission region (PJM) served by EXELON, many of the states bar regulated utilities from owning or operating regulated power plants, in order to foster competition in the generation market and to protect consumers from the risks of power plant construction and operation. (In the old days, consumers got stuck with the bill if the local utility overspent on a construction project. In the competitive market, the builder or operator has no fallback buyer who will pay the costs for their error.)

But there is a fallacy in that reasoning. The financial risk does not go away, and the power plant builder, who no longer has the backup of the utility ratepayer, has to be compensated for the greater risk by earning a higher return on both debt and equity, perhaps one-third higher. If potential builders don't see a good chance to earn that higher return, they will put their money elsewhere, that is, not build power plants where potential returns do not reach their cost of capital. Keep prices down artificially, and don't expect new supply to fill the capacity gap. In other words, all utility customers pay to cover financial risks already through a pricing mechanism rather than through the regulatory process. If not, no new investment.

At the same time, local governors are upset by already high prices. And while they can influence state regulators, the regional transmission organization reports to the Feds at the FERC. So what's the solution, especially if it looks as if the market will not provide the needed reliable energy?

First, everyone must recognize that fixing the electric grid or network will raise costs (and fixing it to support AI will add even more to costs).

Second, if the market can't attract capital to assure reliable service over the long term, then something is wrong with the market. So fix it.

Third, if you believe that the competitive generation market cannot assure service at a reasonable price, then let the utilities build generation again. Just regulate them better to reduce risks.

Fourth, if you don't believe that an assemblage of utility executives, lobbyists, upset politicians, irate consumers, entrenched transmission bureaucrats and regulators from numerous jurisdictions can fix the problem that Mr. Butler foresees before next summer, then buy some batteries or an on-site generator. That might be the most reliable solution.

Okay, doomsayers, by and large, warn people in order to prompt action to prevent or mitigate disastrous events. They hope to evade Cassandra's fate. Maybe the lights won't go out on a colossally large scale in 2027, but based on degrading reliability trends, they will go out in many places. Is it time to look for new remedies before we have to tell consumers not to expect electricity service when the temperature rises above 90 Fahrenheit or on alternate Thursdays? Just a thought.

U.S. LNG Exporter Reaps Windfall as Middle East Turmoil Drives Fees Higher

US Crude Oil, Product Inventories Fall Even As Hormuz Traffic Begins to Flow

Oilprice Intelligence brings you the signals before they become front-page news. This is the same expert analysis read by veteran traders and political advisors. Get it free, twice a week, and you'll always know why the market is moving before everyone else.

You get the geopolitical intelligence, the hidden inventory data, and the market whispers that move billions - and we'll send you $389 in premium energy intelligence, on us, just for subscribing. Join 400,000+ readers today. Get access immediately by clicking here.